From lurker-index@localhost Sun Sep 18 14:26:51 2016
Return-Path: <owner-mutt-users-M24730@mutt.org>
Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with
  IMAP4-SSL; 18 Sep 2016 12:26:51 -0000
Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr
Delivery-date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:24:28 +0200
Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:42408 helo=gbnet.net)
	by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <owner-mutt-users-M24730@mutt.org>)
	id 1blb8x-0000iI-0i
	for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:24:23 +0200
Received: (qmail 10024 invoked by uid 611); 18 Sep 2016 12:21:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 9930 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 12:20:13 -0000
Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37)
  by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 18 Sep 2016 12:20:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 13310 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 12:20:09 -0000
Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5)
  by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 18 Sep 2016 12:20:09 -0000
Received: from alt1.smtp5.plusvps.com ([89.201.164.167])
	by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr>)
	id 1blb4p-0003Cd-0P
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:20:09 +0100
Received: from lin16.mojsite.com ([178.218.164.164])
	by smtp5.plusvps.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr>)
	id 1blb4l-000FGW-CG
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:20:03 +0200
Received: from 93-138-107-15.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.107.15]:53462 helo=g0n.localdomain)
	by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr>)
	id 1blb4k-0008DZ-Kk
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:20:02 +0200
Received: by g0n.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 76D6843; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:20:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:20:12 +0200
From: Miroslav Rovis <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr>
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links
 right]
Message-ID: <20160918122012.GP31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <20160918101504.oz7teg4va3x6gn44@initnull.ddns.net>
 <20160918111847.GA4664@rz.localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160918111847.GA4664@rz.localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details, Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: , not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-3.199, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30)
X-Spam-Status: No, No, No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lin16.mojsite.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mutt.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - croatiafidelis.hr
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: lin16.mojsite.com: authenticated_id: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr
X-Authenticated-Sender: lin16.mojsite.com: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIR2SJy4mPedjCjbCVmstzVxwmVN+qmOsqPA4awzKV+nfEy9+6i+HVSod
 DWEH1Oag5P0gpBbsmKo2xFYd4cLbfj1iLS35izL9ptKuULkIwwsu0z6bhalFEM/pjPCQA+BAli/U
 axx/9BPrhytmBx9SD5Tm/fi5kVpkU5Ceh4R9F6f2uBlCLpm1Pr2bG+h1x1mo3K57NCqrty1cqlju
 QDasyN/AVv5vo2pR7VhL+1jVxoYLGUaYOtXnCEKYjH+AqUYggOvgAXLsTT2MQ2GAZLBD8R1oLyjd
 tB1jSuI5MZKCmdTl31/E3ahF5MMcDI7KdpjQKUa6LXlbC6o54S6xX5BWjHH2v+CMVzdZQq2fx/Ly
 9c6buoF1YHweasy9+/Ad3i3xbm7nO3h8N/Kp12oO6Lfef9Q0bRdiIM9FFlfh4Bu9E5Fc/S+IhDi6
 doUA+LP80CszFbp0CqbVpZvUxoRsAYHyvN0JUHYLB2G4EfN9ghPY2O2e7MDucDbUR8T3zSUCw28D
 SwEiRQv+PVjjwa+Z5RFCOMQjOhMNVAra/0V5sXWv+kpj4iXwjlL8lh+/xwVCxffWBA==
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net
X-FidoGuard-Class: ham
X-FidoGuard-Evidence: SB/global_tokens (0.00648070748904)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
List-Post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1blb8x-0000iI-0i
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24730@mutt.org
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?=


--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 160918-13:18+0200, Richard Z wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:15:04PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > * On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 11:21PM -0700 Ian Zimmerman (itz@primate.net) mu=
ttered:
> > > Can anyone else verify Miro's signature?
> >=20
> > [-- Begin signature information --]
> > Good signature from: Miroslav Rovis (consacrated to Heart of Jesus)
> > <miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr>
> >             created: Sun 18 Sep 2016 01:25:09 CEST
> > WARNING: We have NO indication whether the key belongs to the person
Pretty strange, if true. It's always used to be:

There is no indication that this key really belongs to the owner

That it would turn BAD is hard to conceive for me. I'm far from an
expert, but I do use my GnuPG correctly.

However, I use old GnuPG, and that could have something to do with the posts
about my PGP-key...

Here's what my current Gentoo Portage tree has:

# ls -ltr /usr/portage/app-crypt/gnupg/
total 200
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  3372 2015-08-24 12:49 gnupg-1.4.19.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 89046 2015-11-09 05:11 ChangeLog-2015
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  3384 2015-12-29 14:58 gnupg-1.4.20.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4978 2016-03-30 13:26 gnupg-2.0.29-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4980 2016-04-07 20:19 gnupg-2.0.30.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4505 2016-06-15 23:55 gnupg-2.1.12-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4453 2016-06-16 21:31 gnupg-2.1.13.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4850 2016-06-22 19:40 gnupg-2.0.28.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4937 2016-06-22 19:40 gnupg-2.0.26-r3.ebuild
drwxr-xr-x 2 portage portage  4096 2016-06-24 13:53 files
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4433 2016-07-28 19:55 gnupg-2.1.14-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  1211 2016-08-06 23:32 metadata.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  4433 2016-08-20 01:42 gnupg-2.1.15.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage  3379 2016-09-01 16:21 gnupg-1.4.21.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 11457 2016-09-01 17:10 Manifest
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 13045 2016-09-01 17:10 ChangeLog
#

And this is my gnupg:

# equery l gnupg
 * Searching for gnupg ...
[IP-] [  ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.21:0
#

My use of the old GnuPG, such as can be seen I precluded anything newer tha=
n:
Uninstalling dbus and *kits (to Unfacilitate Remote Seats)
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-992146.html#7559406
where you can see: ">=3Dapp-crypt/gnupg-2.0.22"=20

[My use of the old GnuPG] could be the reason... But I still trust my
distro... And I install with emerge-webrsync and some of the guys that sign
those packages I'm sure would never allow bad programs... But they can't
possibly check every program either....

Don't know...

=3D=3D=3D

But, really nobody cares to reply to my query about the *urlview* not doing=
 the
work?

E.g. just check if in your Mutt it is like in mine with the email that I se=
nt
and expained?

Thanks in advance!

> > named as shown above
> > Fingerprint: FCF1 3245 ED24 7DCE 4438  55B7 EA98 8488 4FBA F0AE
> > [-- End signature information --]
> >=20
> > NeoMutt 20160910 (1.7.0)
> > gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.15
> > libgcrypt 1.7.3-beta
> > libgpgme++2v5 (4.14.10-5)
> >=20
> > Michael
> > --=20
> > PGP-Key-ID:     EEE7D043
> > Jabber:         init0@jabber.de
>=20
> the message would have been at least moderately usefull if you would sign
> it, otherwise the evil dark might has probably faked it as well.
>=20
>=20
> Richard
>=20
> --=20
> Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
>=20



--=20
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wUVF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE--
